Are PCR and NAAT the same?

Posted by Jack on December 12, 2022

PCR is a rapid test for identifying an antigen or protein. It is also known as a nucleic acid amplification test. NAAT is another test that is very fast, but has a higher sensitivity. It is often used in combination with PCR to detect the presence of antigens in a patient's bloodstream.


PCR and NAAT are two different types of genetic testing. Both use enzymes to amplify genetic material, such as DNA and RNA. The difference between the tests is how much of the viral genetic material is amplified. Both of these procedures are used to detect the presence of disease.

PCR is an amplification technique that uses a technique called thermal cycling to increase the amount of genetic material. PCR is also known as a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. It is considered the gold standard for COVID-19 testing. It is used to identify the presence of the virus before infection.

Several methods are used in amplification, including strand displacement amplification, helicase-dependent amplification, and loop mediated isothermal amplification. These techniques use primers that bind viral RNA of interest. They allow for amplification of the RNA, which gives off a fluorescent signal.

There are different PCR tests available for SARS-CoV-2. Some of them are more sensitive than others. The most sensitive type of test is the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

In addition, there are rapid antigen assays that have been designed for quicker results. Generally, they are performed with a nose swab or saliva. These tests are not as accurate as laboratory-based ones. However, they are still acceptable in some countries, such as Belize.

Using a rapid PCR test, a patient can obtain a diagnosis within 30 minutes or less. This type of test is also known as point-of-care testing. They are not as accurate as laboratory-based tests, and it is important to collect the sample correctly.

In order to determine the sensitivity of the test, the samples were compared with the results from other molecular tests. A number of tests were compared, including the Veritor, the Binax, and the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assays.

The results from these comparisons show that the performance of these assays is similar to that of the NAATs. The NPA (negative percent agreement) for these tests was 100%. It is very important to remember that there are many factors that can influence the accuracy of these tests. Among the most important are the method of collection, specimen handling, and the part of the body where the sample is collected.

Rapid antigen assays

Molecular tests, such as PCR or NAAT, are a great way to quickly detect SARS-CoV-2. These tests work by detecting small amounts of genetic material inside virus particles. However, it is important to know that these tests are not as sensitive as the COVID test.

The most reliable SARS-CoV-2 tests are laboratory-based NAATs. These are fast, accurate, and can provide results within an hour or less. The sensitivity of these tests depends on the sample type. A nasal swab is an excellent specimen for antigen testing.

Rapid diagnostic tests, such as lateral flow immunoassays and point of care chromatographic immunoassays, are also available. These assays use premade antibodies to capture viral particles. They are fast, cheap, and can be used to diagnose outbreaks. They are especially useful in high-prevalence serial testing environments.

While there are many different tests for SARS-CoV-2, they can be divided into two main groups. These groups are based on sensitivity and specificity.

In general, a positive antigen test represents the presence of the active virus. A negative one indicates that the person is not currently infected with the disease. If the test is performed outside of the recommended time window, there may be a small chance of a false negative result. Regardless, it is never an excuse for not implementing standard transmission prevention measures.

While there are several different types of antigen tests, there is no single test that is the most effective in detecting SARS-CoV-2. The best way to determine which type is right for you is to consult with your healthcare provider.

These tests are useful for outbreak investigations and for rapid triage in emergency departments. They can also be used to quickly detect infections in vaccinated people. In addition, they can be administered in a variety of settings, including non-healthcare settings.

While there are many different tests available for detecting SARS-CoV-2, the most appropriate test is based on the patient's clinical presentation, risk factors, and exposure history. Some tests, such as the Hologic Aptima SARS-CoV-2 Assay, are approved for use on symptomatic individuals by the FDA.


Detection of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material varies widely depending on which method is used. For example, the sensitivity of PCR and NAAT tests is affected by the duration of the viral replication in the natural infection and the number of samples collected. Also, the sensitivity of these tests is dependent on the site of collection.

The sensitivity of laboratory-based NAATs is higher than that of point-of-care (POC) tests. A POC test typically takes hours to days to complete, whereas a laboratory-based NAAT can be completed in less than 30 minutes. Moreover, laboratory-based NAATs are more sensitive than POC NAATs because they can confirm the results of lower sensitivity tests.

The sensitivity of PCR and NAAT tests should be interpreted based on the predictive values of the tests. For example, if a rapid antigen RDT has high positivity, it is likely that the patient is infectious. However, if the test is negative, then the patient is not infected.

Several factors affect the sensitivity of these tests, including the amount of viral load in the sample, the assay limit of detection, and the time since the patient's infection began. The degree to which these factors affect sensitivity is unclear. For example, the sensitivity of a serial NAAT is typically only available for large numbers of patients.

In a study of over 20000 patients, only 3.5% of patients tested positive after a negative PCR. Similarly, only 10% of patients in a single center study in China tested positive after a negative RT-qPCR. Nevertheless, a positive PCR/NAAT result indicates that the virus is present in the sample. It therefore indicates the potential for the rapid spread of the virus.

The sensitivity of ID NOW is lower than that of RT-PCR. However, it has a very high level of agreement with RT-PCR. In addition, it can be read on-site in as little as 15 minutes. It is therefore effective in identifying SARS-CoV-2 in the ambulatory patient population. A systematic review supports its effectiveness.

The sensitivity of the NAAT can be affected by the assay limit of detection, the time since the virus was first discovered, and the type of specimen being collected. Studies using discrepant analysis were excluded from the calculation of sensitivity.

False negatives

Whether you're testing for the current SARS-CoV-2 infection or outbreak investigations, the results of your NAAT and PCR tests can be important in determining how to treat or take action to reduce disease. A positive NAAT or PCR results indicates that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is present in the sample and is an active infection.

There are a few factors that can affect the sensitivity of a NAAT or PCR. They include the assay limit of detection, the time since an infection started, and the clinical presentation. The impact of alternative sampling sites and the dynamics of viral replication in the natural infection can also influence clinical sensitivity.

A negative PCR/NAAT result indicates that the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid is not present in the sample. While this may not rule out the infection, it may be insufficient sensitivity to continue isolation. A positive result indicates that the SARS-CoV-2 is present in the sample and is an active, ongoing infection.

In the case of a negative PCR/NAAT result, a follow-up test may be required to confirm the result. This may be necessary if the person has been exposed to other coronaviruses or has a high pretest probability. In addition, a positive PCR/NAAT result indicates that the symptomatic individual has a high risk of rapidly spreading the infection.

A positive PCR/NAAT result indicates that a viral nucleic acid is present in the specimen and is an active infection. It is important to treat the individual as infectious and to isolate them per California Department of Public Health guidance.

Although the false negative rate is minimized 3 days after symptom onset, false positives are still possible. The higher the prevalence of the disease, the more likely it is that a symptomatic individual will have a positive PCR/NAAT result. The more transmissible variants of the disease, the more important it is to control the false negative rate.

If an initial PCR/NAAT is negative, a repeat PCR/NAAT should be performed 5-7 days after the first. If a repeat PCR/NAAT is positive, isolation is recommended until confirmatory testing is performed.

There are two main types of viral tests: polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antigen tests. The PCR is more sensitive than the antigen test. The PCR test is usually performed on a nasopharyngeal swab specimen.

Copyright 2021 - 2023 by
Privacy Policy
We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.